Given the huge shortfall in needed electric generating capacity to cover AI, why have Consumers Energy and the MPSC promoted the lie that the Campbell is not needed? Should they be trusted?

Here is the reality regarding our grid in relation to AI electric demand:

“AI gold rush comes with a catch: America could run out of power by 2028 as data centers drain the grid, Morgan Stanley says” –

Read more at:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/ai-gold-rush-comes-with-a-catch-america-could-run-out-of-power-by-2028-as-data-centers-drain-the-grid-morgan-stanley-says/articleshow/125278800.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/ai-gold-rush-comes-with-a-catch-america-could-run-out-of-power-by-2028-as-data-centers-drain-the-grid-morgan-stanley-says/articleshow/125278800.cms?from=mdr

Given this electric demand, the grid cannot afford demolishing the Campbell, no matter how much Consumers Energy and the MPSC say otherwise.

Furthermore, local citizens should not have to sacrifice so that AI data centers can go in. Consumers Energy and the MPSC have shown they cannot be trusted with this. We need local control.